In a recent development, Reno Omokri, a former presidential aide, has criticized Dr. Reuben Abati, a veteran journalist, for suggesting that President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State is grounds for impeachment. Abati had called Tinubu’s actions “unconstitutional” and “dictatorial,” arguing that the President overstepped his authority by granting legislative powers to the appointed administrator, which typically falls under the state’s assembly.
Abati’s Allegations
During a segment on Arise Television’s ‘The Morning Show,’ Abati contended that President Tinubu violated constitutional provisions by allowing the federal executive to assume legislative functions within Rivers State. He argued that such actions could be deemed impeachable offenses and questioned whether the National Assembly would address this perceived overreach.
Omokri’s Counterarguments
Responding to Abati’s assertions, Omokri defended President Tinubu’s decision, stating that the President acted within the legal framework established by the National Assembly. He referenced the Emergency Powers (Repeal and Re-enactment) Bill of 2018, which he claims grants the President authority to suspend a state governor under specific circumstances. Omokri emphasized that disagreements over the law should be resolved through judicial interpretation rather than public calls for impeachment.
FLASHBACK: How Tinubu Rejected State of Emergency Declared by Jonathan
RIVERS: Nigerian Bar Association Faults Declaration of State of Emergency
Clarification on Legislative Powers
Omokri further accused Abati of spreading misinformation by labeling President Tinubu a “dictator” for empowering the Rivers State administrator to issue regulations. He clarified that there is a distinction between laws and regulations: laws establish the legal framework, while regulations provide detailed rules for compliance. According to Omokri, the administrator’s authority to issue regulations is subject to approval by the Federal Executive Council and promulgation by the President, aligning with constitutional provisions.
Conclusion
The debate between Omokri and Abati underscores the complexities surrounding the declaration of a state of emergency and the interpretation of constitutional powers in Nigeria. As discussions continue, it remains essential for legal experts and policymakers to navigate these issues within the bounds of the law to maintain democratic principles and uphold the rule of law.
Get real-time News Updates on Our WHATSAPP channel:
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9qtzXHwXbIyBGtjk2o
